Bacula vs. BackupPC [closed]
        Posted  
        
            by 
                ujjain
            
        on Server Fault
        
        See other posts from Server Fault
        
            or by ujjain
        
        
        
        Published on 2011-06-20T15:15:19Z
        Indexed on 
            2012/10/17
            11:04 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 382
        
I have been googling about the differences between them.
- Bacula has lots of roles
 - BackupPC is easier to configure
 - Bacula works with agent, not rsync (great for Windows backups)
 
It seems that Bacula is most often compared to Amanda though, while BackupPC seems a perfectly lovely and popular backup distribution to.
I currently backup my servers with rsnapshot, but I am looking for a professional scalable solution that could also back-up 50 hosts without problems. Preferably a solution that can offer bare metal restores for my Linux servers. I am not looking to reinstall the exact same version of Plesk, the software, etc...
Update: I see this ranks high in Google, I found a good article: http://www.serverfocus.org/backuppc-vs-bacula-vs-amanda. I personally think that BackupPC is good for smaller environment, but Bacula, despite the high learning curve, is better for environments that requilre scaling.
© Server Fault or respective owner